ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Imaging of Fibrous Dysplasia: A Comprehensive In-Depth Analysis of Monostotic, Polyostotic, Syndromic Forms, and Bone Sarcoma Development.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibrous dysplasia is one of the most common skeletal lesions. The wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranges from asymptomatic conditions (typical of monostotic forms) to severe skeletal diseases with deformity and fractures for polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. The classical radiological features include: an osteolytic geographic pattern, ground-glass bone matrix, cortical thinning/cortical scalloping, bone deformities and enlargement, concavity of margins (evaluated with MRI), and cystic areas (MRI). All the bones can be affected, and the proximal femur is the most common one (about 30% of cases). Nonetheless, the disease can also affect cranio-facial bones, leading to compression of neural structures, as well as deformation and enlargement of facial bones, leading to the so-called "leontiasis ossea" or "facies leonine". The polyostotic forms of fibrous dysplasia can be associated with multiple soft-tissue myomas (Mazabraud syndrome) or several endocrine diseases (McCune-Albright syndrome). In every diagnostic step of the disease, as well as in different fibrous dysplasia forms, imaging plays a key role. Indeed, radiology is fundamental to assess the suspicion of fibrous dysplasia in classical monostotic forms, representing the sole diagnostic tool needed in many cases. Imaging is also fundamental to staging and following up on more severe polyostotic forms, as well as for detecting complications. In this comprehensive updated review article, we examine every aspect of the disease, with a main focus on imaging presentation. The indications for biopsy are discussed as well. Most importantly, the article details the potential risk of malignant transformation (osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and other rarer sarcomas, all accounting for <1% of cases) underlying the radiological patterns of these conditions. The occurrence of aneurysmal bone cyst-like changes on fibrous dysplasia is also analyzed in the article. This review article aims to be a comprehensive guide for radiologists and clinicians involved in the care of patients affected by various forms of fibrous dysplasia, and a starting point for future research. Many classical and atypical cases are collected as an iconographic comprehensive representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.