ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Systems-Level Support for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Learning: A Systematic Review with a Medical Imaging Translation Lens.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid quantum-classical learning pipelines combine conventional accelerators, quantum runtimes, and quantum processing units (QPUs), creating scheduling, memory, isolation, encoding, and deployment challenges that are not captured by application-level quantum machine learning surveys alone. This paper presents a systematic review of runtime and systems mechanisms for hybrid quantum-classical workloads, with medical imaging used as a translation lens rather than as an exclusive inclusion boundary. Following a PRISMA-aligned review process, we screened 364 records and synthesized 40 studies published between 2020 and 2025. Each study was coded by systems layer, application grounding, noisy-label relevance, and evaluation maturity. The coding shows that the corpus combines direct medical evidence with broader transferable systems evidence: 8 studies directly evaluated medical data, 12 were medically motivated, and 20 were generic systems studies. Across the corpus, the strongest support concerns hybrid orchestration, qubit/resource allocation, classical-quantum data movement, and container-based reproducibility, whereas evidence remains limited for realistic clinical operation, end-to-end remote-QPU workflows, multi-tenant isolation, and noisy-label retraining loops. We contribute an evidence map, a direct/indirect/interpretive evidence distinction, and cross-layer design guidelines for future hybrid quantum-classical imaging pipelines in regulated settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.