ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Clinical Impact of Patient Embarrassment in Gynecology: A Comprehensive Review of Barriers, Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From anticipatory fear to relational trust: women's experiences of gynecological examination in Turkey: a qualitative study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient embarrassment represents a significant yet often underrecognized barrier to effective gynecological care. This review integrates multidisciplinary evidence from Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library (2000-2025) to examine the relationship between embarrassment, shame, and modesty and their impact on care-seeking behaviors, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Available data indicate that embarrassment is consistently associated with reduced participation in preventive screening, with up to one-third of non-attenders citing modesty-related concerns. In symptomatic patients, these emotional barriers contribute to clinically meaningful diagnostic delays, particularly in conditions such as cervical cancer, vulvar cancer, and endometriosis. Embarrassment also affects in-consultation behavior, with a substantial proportion of patients reporting withheld concerns or incomplete disclosure of medically relevant information. The consequences extend beyond delayed diagnosis to include reduced treatment adherence, increased disease severity at presentation, and higher healthcare costs due to more complex and resource-intensive interventions. Contributing factors include cultural stigma, prior negative clinical experiences, fear of judgment, and aspects of the clinical environment that may heighten patient vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.