Trial reportMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Transcranial Direct Current Electric Stimulation Combined with Physical Exercise in Patients with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been explored as a strategy for pain management, but no study has investigated its use in Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS). This study evaluated the effects of the combination of resistance exercises (REs) with tDCS on pain, functionality, and quality of life in patients with GTPS.
methodsIn this randomized, double-blind trial, adults with GTPS were allocated to receive tDCS with RE (intervention group, IG) or sham tDCS with RE (control group, CG). Supervised 20 min sessions occurred on four consecutive days. Anodal tDCS (2 mA) was applied over the primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was the VISA-G.BR score at day thirty. Secondary outcomes included pain, functionality, and quality of life at multiple time points, assessed by HAGOS, PQAS, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36.
resultsThirty patients were included. Both groups improved, but between-group differences were nonsignificant for the primary outcome (VISA-G.BR effect size, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.54 to 0.27;
conclusionsThese findings reinforce the value of RE in GTPS while suggesting a limited role for short-term tDCS protocols. Future studies should investigate whether protocols involving a greater number of stimulation sessions may produce superior clinical effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.