ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Ethical and Clinical Boundaries in Genomics & Newborn Screening: A Brief Report from IPIC2025.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Ethics Session of the International Primary Immunodeficiency Congress (IPIC), held in November 2025 and organised by the International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), examined one of the most challenging developments emerging from genomic-enhanced newborn screening: the identification of serious, non-treatable disorders as incidental detection in programmes originally designed to detect severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Using a fictionalised clinical scenario based on the recent literature, the session explored the early diagnosis of ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) detected through TREC-based screening. The discussion highlighted the clinical value and psychological risks associated with presymptomatic detection, the persistent shortcomings in parental consent processes, the systemic pressures created by expanding genomic testing, and the ethical challenges surrounding the reporting and management of incidental findings in screening. The debate underscored the need for internationally coordinated frameworks to guide the management of incidental detection in newborn screening as genomic technologies become more deeply embedded in routine public health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.