ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides empirical evidence on the reading and writing profile of adolescents with twice-exceptionality (2e), specifically those presenting both intellectual giftedness and dyslexia (G-D). Using a quantitative approach, the performance of the G-D group was compared with that of gifted students without dyslexia (G) and students with dyslexia without intellectual giftedness (D) in a sample of Spanish secondary school students. The results indicate that G-D adolescents exhibit a heterogeneous performance pattern across literacy-related measures, characterized by relative weaknesses in lexical and syntactic processes alongside comparatively stronger performance in semantic skills. Although they do not systematically outperform or fall behind the other groups, in specific subtests, G-D students show significantly higher scores than the D group and lower scores than the G group in global reading measures, particularly in the General Reading Index and comprehension tasks. These findings highlight the heterogeneous nature of the G-D profile and suggest that cognitive strengths associated with intellectual giftedness may partially compensate for difficulties related to dyslexia. Understanding this dual profile is essential for improving identification processes and for designing more precise and responsive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.