ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Electroactive Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering: Mechanisms, Design Strategies, and Therapeutic Applications.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Biomimetic 3D Microenvironments for Extracellular Vesicle Programming Toward Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapeutic strategies. Despite substantial advances in conventional biomaterials, their limited ability to support functional integration and dynamically interact with the biological microenvironment continues to hinder therapeutic outcomes. Native cardiovascular tissues rely on tightly regulated bioelectrical signaling to coordinate cellular communication, tissue homeostasis, and functional repair. Consequently, recreating these bioelectrical cues has emerged as a key design principle in cardiovascular tissue engineering. Electroactive biomaterials have gained increasing attention as a promising platform to address this challenge by enabling electrical modulation of cellular behavior and tissue function. In this review, we summarize the intrinsic bioelectrical properties of cardiovascular tissues and discuss the roles of electrical stimulation in regulating disease-relevant cellular responses. We further highlight recent advances in the development of conductive, piezoelectric, and other electroactive biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering applications. Finally, we critically discuss the major challenges and future opportunities in the field, including tissue-specific responses, stimulation parameter optimization, long-term safety, and clinical translation. Collectively, electroactive biomaterials represent a promising and rapidly evolving frontier for the development of dynamic, responsive, and next-generation therapies for cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.