ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Influence of Printing Parameters and Nozzle Diameter on the Effective Microarchitecture and Compressive Modulus of Gyroid PCL Scaffolds.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs) have attracted growing interest in bone tissue engineering because of their high interconnectivity and ability to combine high porosity with mechanical integrity. However, in fused deposition modeling (FDM), printed architecture may systematically deviate from the nominal design, thereby affecting structural fidelity and mechanical performance. This study investigated the influence of FDM processing parameters and nozzle diameter on the effective microarchitecture and compressive elastic modulus of polycaprolactone (PCL) gyroid scaffolds. First, a Taguchi L18 design was used to evaluate the effects of extrusion temperature, printing speed, and flow rate on pore size for two nozzle diameters (0.4 and 0.3 mm). In a second experimental stage, prismatic specimens fabricated at three nominal porosity levels were compression-tested to determine the elastic modulus (E), and measured porosity (ϕ) was quantified by densimetric measurements. A systematic mismatch was observed between the nominal design and the printed scaffold architecture, with both pore size and measured porosity consistently lower than their intended values. The dominant process parameter associated with pore-size variability was nozzle-specific: extrusion temperature contributed most for the 0.4 mm nozzle, whereas printing speed contributed most for the 0.3 mm nozzle. In compression, E decreased with increasing measured porosity, and statistical analysis showed that the E-ϕ relationship was nozzle-dependent. Overall, these findings support a process-structure-property interpretation based on the effective printed microarchitecture rather than on nominal design parameters alone. The experimental stiffness ranges obtained here also provide an exploratory mechanical contextualization relative to reported trabecular bone domains, without implying site-specific scaffold selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.