ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Targeting Biofilms in Chronic Wounds: Emerging Strategies with Antimicrobial Nanocomposites.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polysaccharide based biomaterials for advanced wound healing applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds present a significant challenge to healthcare systems globally, affecting approximately 1% of the population and severely impacting their quality of life. Biofilm development occurs in approximately 90% of chronic wounds, contributing to an increased prevalence of polymicrobial infections. Currently, there is a large quantity of antimicrobial topical treatments, dressings, and advanced therapies. However, many of them are hindered by the complex biofilm environment, antibiotic resistance, and/or host tissue toxicity. Furthermore, conventional treatments such as debridement, systemic/local antibiotics, and negative-pressure therapy are often ineffective at eradicating biofilms and fostering optimal healing conditions. Nanomedicine approaches have shown promising potential to address the limitations of current treatments. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of chronic wounds, the role of biofilms, microenvironmental changes, current treatments and their limitations, and nanocomposite-based strategies to eradicate biofilms and resolve chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.