ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Anatomical Variations in Critical Structures in Esophageal Surgery: Implications for Personalized Surgery.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer remains a global challenge, with poor overall survival despite advances in multimodal therapy. Surgical resection continues to be the main curative treatment, yet esophagectomy is among the most technically challenging oncological procedures due to the esophagus's location within the densely packed mediastinal corridor. Critical vascular, neural, and lymphatic structures surround the esophagus, and their frequent anatomical variations pose significant risks during mobilization, lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction. This review synthesizes current evidence on the anatomical variability in the vessels, nerves, lymphatics, and fascial compartments relevant to esophageal surgery. Particular emphasis is placed on aberrant arterial and venous patterns, recurrent and non-recurrent laryngeal nerve pathways, thoracic duct variants and atypical courses, and the fascial planes that are used to define surgical boundaries. By shifting the surgical paradigm from standardized anatomical assumptions to patient-specific structural mapping, we highlight how understanding these variations is driving the field of personalized surgical medicine. By integrating these anatomical insights with surgical approaches-including right and left transthoracic, transhiatal, and transcervical techniques-we highlight the implications of variations for intraoperative safety and postoperative outcomes. A thorough understanding of these relationships is essential for surgical planning, minimizing morbidity, and achieving oncological outcomes. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of these relationships is essential for patient-tailored surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.