ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
QRS-Corrected Prediction of the Diastolic Rest Period for Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Complete Left Bundle Branch Block.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal phase selection in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is crucial. While the mid-diastolic slow-filling (SF) phase is typically predicted using a conventional formula based on heart rate and atrioventricular conduction time, its validity in complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB)-where pronounced QRS prolongation induces severe mechanical dyssynchrony-remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of bundle branch block on cardiac-phase selection and validated a QRS-corrected predictive model.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 94 patients (sinus rhythm,
resultsIn CLBBB patients, the conventional formula critically overestimated SF by an average of 37.9 ms (RMSE 42.5 ms). Reconstructing simple and multivariate regression models exclusively for the CLBBB group yielded coefficients remarkably similar to the conventional formula, indicating that the fundamental physiological dependency on RR and PQ intervals remains intact despite the bundle branch block. Crucially, the simple proposed QRS-corrected formula successfully eliminated the overestimation bias (mean error -6.9 ms;
conclusionsA completely new predictive regression model is unnecessary for CLBBB patients. Simply incorporating a theoretical subtraction of pathological QRS prolongation optimally corrects the diastolic resting phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.