ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Continuous Suture Technique in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early and Mid-Term Outcomes in a Real-World Cohort Including Combined Procedures.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuous suture technique is not routinely used in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), and data regarding its clinical outcomes remain limited. This retrospective observational study evaluated early and mid-term outcomes after continuous suture SAVR in a real-world cohort. Eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent SAVR using a continuous suture technique between November 2015 and July 2024 were included. Both isolated and concomitant procedures were analyzed. The operative technique consisted of three 2-0 polypropylene sutures, one placed along each aortic cusp. Clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival were assessed. The mean age was 62.22 ± 15.22 years, and 71.6% of patients were male. Bioprosthetic valves were implanted in 61.4% of cases, and the mean prosthesis size was 25.02 ± 0.93 mm. Concomitant procedures were performed in 86.4% of patients. There were no in-hospital deaths. New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 26.1% of patients, and permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 3.4%. The median cross-clamp time was 41.50 min. During a mean follow-up of 18.38 months, one- and three-year overall survival was 92.9%. No prosthetic valve dysfunction related to thrombus, pannus formation, or clinically significant paravalvular leak was observed. Continuous suture SAVR appears feasible and safe, with acceptable early and mid-term outcomes, although the retrospective, non-comparative design requires cautious interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.