ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
CT-Centered Multimodality Imaging of Arterial Wall Fragility in Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Imaging Markers and Clinical Implications.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial wall fragility represents a unifying pathophysiological substrate underlying a broad spectrum of aortic diseases, including aneurysms, dissections, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, and aortitis. Rather than distinct entities, these conditions increasingly appear as interconnected manifestations of impaired wall integrity and maladaptive vascular remodeling. This narrative review provides a structured overview of the imaging correlates of arterial wall fragility from a CT-centered, multimodality perspective. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) remains the first-line imaging modality in acute settings, enabling rapid and comprehensive assessment of vascular anatomy, luminal integrity, and the presence of life-threatening complications. Complementary modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, contribute additional information on tissue characterization and hemodynamic evaluation in selected stable patients, follow-up settings, or specific clinical scenarios. Across imaging modalities, specific features-such as false lumen patency, intramural hematoma characteristics, ulcer-like projections, aneurysm morphology, and periaortic inflammatory changes-have been reported as markers of wall instability. These imaging-derived findings may provide clinically relevant information beyond traditional diameter-based assessment and support more refined risk stratification. Emerging approaches, including artificial intelligence, radiomics, computational modeling, and advanced MRI techniques, are expanding the role of imaging toward quantitative evaluation. However, their routine clinical implementation still requires standardization and prospective validation. Overall, a CT-centered multimodality imaging strategy may support a more comprehensive assessment of arterial wall fragility and contribute to individualized clinical decision-making in patients with aortic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.