Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346325›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026

Correlation Between Accommodative Facility and Light-Evoked Pupil Responses in Individuals with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Curt Fritts-Davis, Andrew T E Hartwick, Marjean T Kulp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Curt Fritts-DavisCollege of Optometry, Ohio State University, 338 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-8415
Andrew T E HartwickCollege of Optometry, Ohio State University, 338 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-7852
Marjean T KulpCollege of Optometry, Ohio State University, 338 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-6998

Funding

NIH HHS NIH T35 EY007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies have shown those with a history of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have altered pupillary light responses compared with those without a history of TBI. Those with a history of TBI are also more likely to have accommodative deficits. We investigated the relationship between light-evoked pupil dynamics and accommodative function in individuals who have previously experienced a TBI.

methodsA total of 17 participants with a history of mild TBI were recruited. Pupil metrics were measured using a commercial pupillometer and included baseline diameter, latency, constriction amplitude, average constriction velocity, peak constriction velocity and peak dilation velocity. Accommodative function was assessed using clinical measurements of facility and amplitude. Pupil metrics were compared among those with versus without accommodative dysfunction.

resultsOne-way ANCOVA testing (controlling for age and time since most recent TBI) comparing groups with and without accommodative dysfunction showed that those with accommodative dysfunction had significantly larger light-evoked pupil constriction amplitudes (

conclusionsThe results of this small-sample study suggest that accommodative function and light-evoked pupillary dynamics are correlated in individuals with a history of TBI. Those with accommodative dysfunction showed greater pupil constriction amplitudes and velocities and this relationship may reflect shared autonomic or oculomotor mechanisms.

Indexed as

accommodationbrain concussionbrain injuriesocularpupiltraumaticvision disorders

Identifiers

PMID42346325
PMCPMC13301583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.