ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026
The Geometry of Suspicion: Visual Exploration Patterns in Email Phishing Detection.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined visual exploration strategies in phishing-email detection by integrating conventional AOI-based eye-tracking measures with a complementary scene-based indicator, the Nearest Neighbor Index (NNI), to capture the global spatial organization of fixations. Thirty-two volunteers completed an email-classification task involving 106 static email stimuli; data from 30 participants were included in the final analyses. For each stimulus, participants judged whether the email was authentic or phishing, allowing for the computation of eye-tracking metrics across Signal Detection Theory classification outcomes. Concerning the NNI, the results showed that the spatial distribution of fixations was higher for suspicious than for non-suspicious emails, indicating a broader visual exploration pattern under higher task demands. More importantly, correct and incorrect responses differed reliably: hits were associated with more dispersed and regular fixation patterns, whereas false alarms were associated with more clustered scanning; misses showed a descriptively similar tendency that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. Participants also responded faster when correct than when incorrect. When cybersecurity awareness (CAIN) was included as a mean-centered covariate, the primary effects of Signal and Outcome on NNI and decision time remained significant, indicating that the experimental effects are robust to individual differences in cybersecurity knowledge. However, CAIN did not emerge as a reliable predictor of eye-tracking measures within these models, suggesting that its role operates more at the level of classification performance than moment-by-moment gaze organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.