ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains characterized by high relapse rates despite advances in induction and consolidation therapy. Relapse prevention represents a major unmet need, particularly in patients ineligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) or at high risk of post-transplant recurrence. This review examines current evidence supporting maintenance strategies following intensive chemotherapy or allo-HSCT, with emphasis on measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided approaches and targeted therapies. We summarize data from randomized and phase II/III trials evaluating hypomethylating agents, FLT3 inhibitors, IDH inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic strategies in post-remission settings. Oral azacitidine (CC-486) demonstrated overall survival benefit in older patients in first complete remission who were not transplant candidates, establishing a standard of care in this population. In FLT3-mutated AML, post-transplant maintenance with sorafenib and gilteritinib reduces relapse risk, with emerging evidence supporting MRD as a predictive biomarker for benefit. Other targeted agents and immunotherapies have shown promising early-phase results, although confirmatory data are limited. Ongoing phase III studies will clarify optimal patient selection, treatment duration, and integration with transplantation, aiming to transform post-remission management from passive surveillance to precision-based relapse prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.