ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
A Prospective Population-Based Study of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a new standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, studies including healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during routine care are lacking. Accordingly, a population-based study was conducted using linked administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. Patients with DLBCL that failed ≥2 lines of systemic therapy were included. Cox proportional hazard models estimated associations between covariates and overall survival (OS). Logistic, binomial and Poisson regression explored associations between covariates with toxicity and HRU. We identified 308 patients enrolled to receive CAR T-cell therapy of which 255 patients received CAR T-cells (mean age 59 years; 39% female). From the date of CAR T-cell infusion, the median OS was 25.0 months (95% CI, 21.6-28.1 months). Cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome data were available for 155 patients and were reported in 135 (87.1%) and 42 (27.1%) patients, respectively. Of those that received CAR-T cells, 172 patients (67%) were hospitalized with a median length of stay of 5 days (IQR, 0-20) and 243 (95%) had an emergency department visit without hospitalization. Our prospective population-based study demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in the real-world to the pivotal trials and highlights this as an efficacious and relatively safe treatment option for patients with DLBCL in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.