Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346259›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Excessive Tearing and Lacrimal and Canalicular Blockage Secondary to Docetaxel in Breast Cancer Patients in the Metastatic and Adjuvant Settings.

Margaret L Pfeiffer, Bita Esmaeli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaret L PfeifferKey-Whitman Eye Center, Dallas, TX 75243, USA.
Bita EsmaeliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2588-6754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While most ophthalmologists and medical oncologists are aware of the excessive tearing and canalicular and lacrimal duct blockage associated with docetaxel, there is lack of deeper understanding of the appropriate management of this side effect and what clinical settings justify surgical intervention as opposed to conservative management. In this review, we summarize the findings in the seminal original research studies that document the association between the frequency of administration of docetaxel and treatment duration and the frequency of excessive tearing as a subjective symptom versus canalicular and lacrimal duct blockage as anatomic findings seen during probing and irrigation. Based on the published literature to date, we note that excessive tearing is a common and important side effect of docetaxel and can be seen in breast cancer patients who are receiving docetaxel either weekly or every three weeks in metastatic or adjuvant settings. However, the anatomic findings of canalicular and lacrimal duct stenosis are almost exclusively seen in patients receiving weekly docetaxel or in patients with metastatic breast cancer who are treated with docetaxel for prolonged periods. Lacrimal duct blockage is much less commonly reported in patients with early breast cancer who are receiving docetaxel every three weeks for short durations and, to our knowledge to date, have not been reported in the literature in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel in the adjuvant setting.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDocetaxelLacrimal Duct ObstructionTearsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelbreast cancercanalicular stenosisdocetaxelepiphoralacrimal duct blockagepunctal stenosistearing

Identifiers

PMID42346259
PMCPMC13298050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.