Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346248›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Perspectives of Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Non-Operative Management (NOM): A Qualitative Study.

Armaghan Alam, Ameer Farooq, Farhad Udwadia, Manoj Raval, Ahmer Karimuddin, Terry Phang, Amandeep Ghuman, Carl Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armaghan AlamDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5118
Ameer FarooqDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada.
Farhad UdwadiaDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9999-4217
Manoj RavalDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9628-747X
Ahmer KarimuddinDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8682-6721
Terry PhangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-9285
Amandeep GhumanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Carl BrownDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in non-operative management (NOM) for rectal cancer patients who achieve a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. The patients' perspectives of these approaches are limited. Here, we describe a qualitative study where we conducted semi-structured interviews with fourteen rectal cancer patients, including seven men and seven women, who were successfully treated by NOM at our center between 2020 and 2022. The responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Four major thematic categories emerged: impact of rectal cancer diagnosis, treatment values, decision-making factors, and the impact of NOM surveillance. Avoidance of a stoma was a major theme in both determining patient treatment values as well as ultimately driving their decision-making. Trust in the treating physician was also found to be a major theme in decision-making. While the psychological burden of surveillance did emerge as a major theme, patients who did not have recurrence were still quite satisfied with their decision to pursue NOM. Limitations of this study include selection bias, the single-center design, and the lack of patients who ultimately experienced recurrence following NOM. As NOM of rectal cancer becomes more commonplace, understanding the patients' perspectives will ensure appropriate counseling and shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchnon-operative managementpatient perspectivesrectal cancersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42346248
PMCPMC13297650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.