ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Strengthening Biomarker Research in Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials: A Pathology-Focused White Paper.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathology is foundational to biomarker-driven and translational oncology research, yet systemic barriers limit full pathology engagement in Canadian cancer clinical trials, compromising the tissue-based questions such trials are designed to answer. This commentary and white paper synthesizes the perspectives of a national pathology working group convened at the 2025 Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) Annual General Meeting with a descriptive internal audit of the CCTG Tumour Tissue Data Repository (TTDR), in which biospecimen attrition was tabulated at the patient level by disease site; no inferential testing was performed. The TTDR data revealed substantial attrition across disease sites, with no tissue submitted for 32-44% of patients and slides submitted in place of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks for up to 51% of cases, reflecting persistent misalignment between protocol expectations and laboratory capacity. From these observations, five interrelated gaps were identified-in trial design, funding and resourcing, digital pathology infrastructure, academic recognition, and knowledge translation around consent and ethics governance. Five corresponding strategies are proposed to align research demands with pathology capacity, reduce attrition, and strengthen biomarker-driven trials. As a consensus- and experience-driven analysis rather than a systematic review, these recommendations are intended to frame a national conversation and a starting point for prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.