ArticleCells2026
Cytoskeletal Regulation of Podosome-Focal Adhesion Balance in GM-CSF- and Flt3L-Derived Dendritic Cells.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are key antigen-presenting cells essential for the initiation of immune responses. Their migration is tightly regulated by adhesive structures, including podosomes and focal adhesions (FAs), allowing for interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM) for coordinated cell movement. The organization and dynamics of these structures are controlled by actin and microtubule cytoskeletons; however, the mechanisms governing their balance in distinct DC subsets are not completely understood. In this study, we investigated cytoskeletal regulation of the interplay between podosomes and FAs in GM-CSF-derived inflammatory-like DCs (GM-BMDCs) and Flt3L-derived conventional DCs (FL-BMDCs). GM-BMDCs showed a higher capacity to form podosomes compared with FL-BMDCs, which exhibited fewer and less prominent structures. Actin depolymerization resulted in the complete loss of podosomes, whereas disruption of microtubules induced podosome reorganization and altered the structure of FAs. Importantly, cytoskeletal perturbation in both DC subsets led to podosome dissolution, highlighting the requirement of cytoskeletal integrity for their maintenance. Furthermore, actin integrity was essential for podosome-mediated ECM degradation and efficient migration of GM-BMDCs, while microtubules fine-tuned the balance between podosome and focal adhesion dynamics, thereby regulating DC motility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.