ReviewCells2026
A Unified Taxonomy for the Circulating Tumor Microenvironment (cTME) and Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells (C-TACs): A Conceptual Framework for Precision Oncology.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe growing complexity of liquid biopsy in precision oncology demands a structured classification framework that can accommodate its expanding multi-omic scope. As the field has matured from early Tumor Microemboli research-focused on multicellular clusters of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that drive high-efficiency metastasis-to the broader systemic analysis of the "Tumor Microenvironment" (TME) encompassing malignant and non-malignant components, the need for a hierarchical taxonomy has become evident.
objectiveTo integrate these diverse data streams into a coherent clinical framework, a multi-tiered classification system is needed. This review proposes a foundational roadmap that formally distinguishes the systemic ecosystem from its physical and functional subsets and highlights their clinical utility in therapeutic decision-making. Proposed Taxonomy: We advocate for the adoption of Circulating Tumor Microenvironment (cTME) as the inclusive term for the systemic environment, encompassing non-cellular factors such as ctDNA, extracellular vesicles, and biophysical attributes. Conversely, physical cellular clusters should be strictly classified as Circulating Tumor Emboli (CTE). Crucially, we define Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells (C-TACs) as the functional cellular subset within the cTME, encompassing single CTCs, CTE, and supporting non-malignant cells like CTECs and CAFs. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS: Establishing this distinction allows for the seamless integration of molecular profiling (NGS) and functional assays. We highlight emerging evidence that C-TACs may serve as the primary substrate for Chemo-Response Profiling (CRP), with early proof-of-concept studies reporting high concordance with clinical outcomes that still await independent prospective confirmation. Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that identifying these functional units, particularly perioperative CTE, may help predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage malignancies, although this remains to be confirmed in prospective studies.
conclusionsAdopting this unified taxonomy may help advance precision oncology. By recognizing the cTME as the superordinate ecosystem and C-TACs as its functional executors, clinicians may be better positioned to interpret multi-modal liquid biopsy data, providing a conceptual roadmap for integrating these technologies into platforms for personalized cancer management. We emphasize that this framework is intended to be hypothesis-generating and that its clinical applications require prospective validation before routine adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.