ReviewCells2026
Angiogenic Gene Therapy for Lower Extremity Ischemia: Experimental Advances and Clinical Experience.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb-threatening ischemia remain major clinical challenges, particularly in patients who are not candidates for surgical or endovascular revascularization. These limitations have stimulated extensive investigation into therapeutic angiogenesis using gene therapy approaches. This review summarizes experimental and clinical studies employing non-viral and viral gene delivery systems for the transfer of angiogenic factors, including VEGF, FGF-2, HGF, HIF-1α, and SDF-1. Particular attention is given to vector platforms, study design, patient populations, clinical endpoints, and safety outcomes reported in preclinical investigations and clinical trials. Although several studies demonstrated biological activity and favorable safety profiles, randomized trials such as RAVE and TAMARIS failed to demonstrate consistent and significant clinical efficacy. These findings emphasize the translational challenges associated with therapeutic angiogenesis and highlight the persistent gap between promising preclinical data and clinical outcomes in humans. Future progress in the field will likely depend on improved vector engineering, tissue-specific and regulated gene expression systems, optimized delivery strategies, and the integration of gene therapy with emerging regenerative technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.