ReviewCells2026
Decoding Glioblastoma Complexity Through Extracellular Vesicles, Organ-on-Chip Models, and Deep Learning.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Small Extracellular Vesicles for Colon-Targeted Delivery: Microenvironment-Responsive Design, Therapeutic Mechanisms, and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive human cancers, with therapeutic failure driven by pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity, microenvironmental plasticity, immune suppression, blood-brain barrier (BBB)-related pharmacological constraints, and adaptive resistance mechanisms. A major limitation in GBM research is the lack of a human-relevant experimental system able to reproduce these dynamic features while generating interpretable, multimodal datasets. In this context, we propose a testable organ-on-chip (OoC)-extracellular vesicle (EV)-deep learning (DL) framework in which patient-derived GBM cells, endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, stromal cells, and immune components are organized within perfused microphysiological systems. EVs are selectively and temporally harvested from defined compartments, and imaging, barrier-function, sensor, and EV-cargo data are integrated through modality-specific and multimodal DL architectures. This framework is intended not as an immediately validated clinical tool but as an experimental roadmap for linking EV-mediated communication to measurable phenotypes such as BBB disruption, invasion, immune reprogramming, and drug response. We critically discuss the technical requirements of BBB-on-chip systems, EV source attribution, immune-component integration, DL model selection, data scarcity, overfitting, batch effects, domain shift, regulatory barriers, cost, throughput, and reproducibility. By repositioning OoC-EV-DL integration as a staged translational strategy rather than a clinically established solution, this work aims to define a realistic and biologically grounded route for advancing precision oncology in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.