Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346077›Full record

ReviewCells2026

Influence of Cryopreservation of Pre-Implantation Embryos on the Epigenome.

Tom Trapphoff, Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter, Karoline Hohenstein, Saskia Möckel, Stefan Dieterle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom TrapphoffDortmund Fertility Center, 44135 Dortmund, Germany.
Ursula Eichenlaub-RitterDepartment of Gene Technology/Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Karoline HohensteinDortmund Fertility Center, 44135 Dortmund, Germany.
Saskia MöckelDortmund Fertility Center, 44135 Dortmund, Germany.
Stefan DieterleDortmund Fertility Center, 44135 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-6537-3313

Funding

Theramex Germany GmbH Cryopreservation of oocytes, zygotes and embryos and the influence on the epigenetic profile
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cryopreservation of pre-implantation embryos has become routine in medically assisted reproduction (MAR), and the proportion of frozen embryo transfers has steadily increased in recent years. Because cryopreservation through either slow-cooling protocols or ultra-rapid vitrification requires potentially cytotoxic cryoprotective agents to prevent uncontrolled and detrimental ice crystal formation, the safety of these procedures must be carefully considered. Evidence from human epidemiological studies, including retrospective and prospective controlled studies, and data from national patient registries indicate that children born after frozen embryo transfer have a higher birth weight than those born after spontaneous conception and have an increased risk of rare genomic imprinting disorders, such as Beckwith-Wiedemann, Silver-Russell, or Prader-Willi syndrome. Encompassing not only reversible DNA methylation patterns established during gametogenesis, but also the timed abundance and availability of transcripts and proteins required to establish or maintain epigenetic marks throughout development and differentiation, as well as persistent or transient post-translational histone modifications and non-coding RNAs, the epigenome may be particularly sensitive to cryopreservation. Importantly, epigenetic regulation is highly complex. Alterations of the epigenome at any developmental stage are often not monocausal, do not necessarily result in immediate disturbances in the pre-implantation embryo, and are unlikely to operate through simple all-or-nothing mechanisms; however, they may have long-lasting effects at later developmental stages. To make matters even more complex, differences between species in terms of epigenetic regulation or lineage differentiation are well known and translation from animal model systems to humans must be considered with caution. More recently, epigenetic regulation by non-coding RNAs has also come into focus, as these molecules are crucial, either directly or indirectly, for gene expression, translation, and protein biosynthesis during development. Therefore, assessing potential adverse effects of cryopreservation on the entire epigenome remains a major challenge, particularly because little is known about indirect factors, such as post-translational histone modifications and non-coding RNAs. In this review, we focus on the potential influence of the cryopreservation of pre-implantation embryos on the epigenetic profile in humans and animals. Specifically, we consider DNA methylation of imprinted genes and global DNA methylation; post-translational histone modifications; the abundance and availability of transcripts and proteins required to establish, maintain, or protect epigenetic patterns; and the presence of non-coding RNAs involved in epigenetic control.

Indexed as

BlastocystCryopreservationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeAnimalsDNA MethylationHumanscryopreservationDNA methylationepigenomemedically assisted reproductionnon-coding RNApost-translational histone modificationpre-implantation embryos

Identifiers

PMID42346077
PMCPMC13297363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.