Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346050›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026

Operationalizing the Construct of the Internal Saboteur: Development and Psychometric Validation of the Internal Saboteur Scale (ISS).

Vincenzo Caretti, Eleonora Topino, Andrea Fontana, Gianluigi Di Cesare, Clara Mucci, Adriano Schimmenti, Alessio Gori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincenzo CarettiDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-1729
Eleonora TopinoDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Via Isimbardi, 10, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0849-1249
Andrea FontanaDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-1696
Gianluigi Di CesarePrevention and Early Intervention Complex Operative Unit, Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy.
Clara MucciDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Via Salvecchio 19, 24129 Bergamo, Italy.
Adriano SchimmentiDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, UKE-Kore University of Enna, Piazza dell'Università, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-2648
Alessio GoriDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Pad. 26, 50135 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-2319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The internal saboteur may be understood as a multidimensional configuration of maladaptive inner processes involving recurrent negative self-evaluation, distressing relational expectations, repetitive negative thinking, and self-undermining inner experiences. Within this framework, the present study aimed to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Internal Saboteur Scale (ISS), a self-report measure designed to assess this construct. A sample of 328 Italian adults (women 71.6%; Mage = 37.37, SD = 14.88) completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses supported both an eight-factor correlational model and a theoretically meaningful higher-order model, in which the lower-order dimensions were grouped into four broader domains: Negative Relational Expectations (Expected Rejection; Expected Judgment), Self-Devaluation (Negative Self-Appraisal; Interpersonal Unworthiness), Rumination (Retrospective Rumination; Anticipatory Rumination), and Internal Destructiveness (Helplessness; Defensive Relational Withdrawal). Measurement invariance across gender was also supported. All dimensions showed satisfactory-to-good internal consistency. Furthermore, ISS scores were negatively associated with secure attachment, self-reassurance, and mentalizing and positively associated with insecure attachment, self-criticism, shame, and anger. Overall, the ISS appears to be a theoretically grounded and psychometrically promising instrument for the assessment of maladaptive inner dialogue and self-sabotaging internal processes. It may represent a useful tool for both research and clinical practice, particularly in supporting transdiagnostic assessment and case formulation.

Indexed as

internal saboteurmaladaptive inner processesrelational expectationsruminationscale validationself-devaluation

Identifiers

PMID42346050
PMCPMC13297656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.