ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2026
Imaging-Guided Algorithmic Management of Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A 13-Year Institutional Analysis of 495 Joints.
Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Mandibular condylar fractures continue to be a subject of debate, traditionally framed as a choice between open and conservative management. However, this binary approach fails to adequately account for fracture-level anatomy, Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement, and functional outcomes. (2) Purpose: To present an imaging-guided, fracture-level-based algorithm that integrates radiologic evaluation, surgical approach selection, fixation biomechanics, and functional rehabilitation. (3) Review Strategy: This invited review combines current evidence with a 13-year institutional experience involving 495 joints. High-resolution Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging was used to assess fracture morphology, displacement, and ramal height, while Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was selectively employed in intracapsular fractures to evaluate disc-condyle relationships when intra-articular involvement was suspected. Management decisions, including surgical approach and fixation strategy, were guided by an institutional algorithm tailored to fracture characteristics. (4) Results: Implementation of this approach yielded consistent and predictable outcomes. Mouth opening improved from approximately 18.77 mm preoperatively to 40 mm at 6 months. Lateral excursions became symmetrical (~9.6 mm), occlusion was restored in all patients, and bite force returned to near-physiological levels. Pain scores showed near complete resolution within 1 month. Postoperative morbidity remained low, with predominantly transient facial nerve weakness. (5) Conclusions: This imaging-guided, algorithmic framework provides reproducible functional outcomes and signifies a shift toward structured, anatomically driven management of condylar fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.