Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346033›Full record

ArticleEpigenomes2026

Nuclear Transfer Perturbs Genomic Balance.

Eryk Andreas, Justin C St John

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eryk AndreasExperimental Mitochondrial Genetics Group, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Justin C St JohnExperimental Mitochondrial Genetics Group, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-1449

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2000723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transfer of a nucleus from one oocyte to another offers patients harbouring high levels of mitochondrial DNA mutation and sufferers of frequent fertilisation failure or early embryonic arrest the potential to have healthy children. However, a small amount of mtDNA is carried over with the nucleus as the transfer takes place. Consequently, we still need to distinguish between the effects of the carryover and the transfer of a nucleus itself from a mature oocyte.

methodsTo overcome this, we analysed a series of hatching stage blastocysts generated using metaphase II spindle transfer and mitochondrial supplementation. The latter approach also introduces a small amount of mtDNA into the oocyte as fertilisation takes place. For both manipulations, an autologous approach was used to overcome the effects of third-party transfer.

resultsWe then compared the changes in global gene expression between the two groups. We found that the nuclear transfer process affected a number of gene networks and pathways. These included metabolic, cell cycle, inflammatory and immune, and epigenetic responses. A comparison with earlier stage blastocysts did not suggest that the cause was due to developmental delay.

conclusionsCritically, these changes could affect offspring health and well-being as is the case following somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Indexed as

gene expressiongenomic balancemetaphase II spindle transfermitochondrial supplementationmtDNAnuclear transferoocytepreimplantation embryo

Identifiers

PMID42346033
PMCPMC13298466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.