Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346019›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

On manipulating motion gain in immersive virtual environments: An unidentified source of external noise and a new psychometric function.

Tom C A Freeman, Joshua D Haynes, Maria Gallagher, John F Culling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tom C A FreemanSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Joshua D HaynesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maria GallagherSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
John F CullingSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In immersive virtual environments and other interactive settings the motion gain linking stimulus motion to self-movement is often manipulated to study perceptual performance. We show that this introduces a previously unidentified source of external noise we term gain-dependent noise. The noise arises from trial-to-trial variability in self-movement and can distort the shape of the psychometric function. This leads to overestimates of threshold and sensory measurement noise, and misinterpreted lapse rates when fitting standard sigmoidal functions like a cumulative Gaussian. Using a model observer with minimal assumptions, simulations show the situation is more critical when the coefficient of variation of self-movement (i.e., across-trial standard deviation/mean) is relatively high, and measurement noise associated with image-based and idiothetic signals is relatively low. We derive a new gain-dependent psychometric function that separates sensory measurement noise from gain-dependent noise, and provide a MATLAB fitting routine (fitgdpmf).

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionPsychometricsVirtual RealityHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42346019
PMCPMC13313194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.