ArticleEuropean burn journal2026
Automated Classification of Second- and Third-Degree Burn Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in European burn journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Classification of Second- and Third-Degree Burn Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.European burn journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurn severity assessment is clinically relevant and often requires timely decision-making. Visual classification of second- and third-degree burns remains subjective and prone to observer variability.
methodsThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning model for the automatic classification of second- and third-degree burn images. A dataset of clinical burn images from a private wound care clinic was used to train a convolutional neural network. Hyperparameter optimization and color channel sensitivity analysis were performed to identify the optimal model configuration. Model performance was evaluated using standard classification metrics on training, validation, and independent test datasets, and results were compared with transfer learning approaches.
resultsThe best performance was achieved using a compact model trained exclusively with the green color channel, obtaining an accuracy of 0.94, precision of 0.96, recall of 0.92, and an F1-score of 0.94 on the independent test set. This model outperformed more complex transfer learning approaches while reducing computational complexity.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that using only the green color channel enables efficient and accurate burn classification. The proposed model was also integrated into a graphical user interface, supporting its potential application in clinical and educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.