ReviewBiosensors2026
Electropolymerized Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Supported on Carbon-Based Materials for (Bio)sensing: Direct and Indirect Detection Strategies.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Biosensing: From Synthetic Recognition to Integrated Biointerfaces.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Electrothermal Synthesis of Cell-Imprinted Polymer Coatings on Metallic Microwires for Bacterial Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) offer robust, cost-effective, and highly selective alternatives to fragile biological receptors. Specifically, electropolymerization has emerged as a versatile strategy that enables the precise, in situ formation of uniform MIP films directly on electrode surfaces. This review provides a comprehensive overview of electropolymerized MIPs (eMIPs) supported on advanced carbon-based materials for electrochemical (bio)sensing. We emphasize how the synergistic integration of eMIPs with carbonaceous architectures significantly enhances electron transfer, active surface area, and overall analytical sensitivity. Key fabrication aspects are systematically discussed, including monomer selection, electropolymerization parameters, and efficient template removal. A central aspect of this work is the critical categorization of sensing mechanisms into direct and indirect detection strategies. This distinction elucidates how eMIPs can quantify a broad spectrum of electroactive and non-electroactive targets in complex matrices, while strategically avoiding excessively high applied potentials. Finally, alongside outlining the transition of these systems into portable technologies, we address a critical shortcoming in the current literature: the urgent need for analytical standardization through the rigorous reporting of Imprinting and Selectivity Factors using Non-Imprinted Polymer (NIP) controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.