ReviewBiosensors2026
Intelligent Biosensors for Diabetic Wound Monitoring.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic chronic wounds, characterized by persistent inflammation and a complex microenvironment, pose a major challenge to global healthcare. Traditional dressings act merely as passive physical barriers, lacking the ability to sense biochemical fluctuations or respond to dynamic pathological changes. Therefore, developing smart platforms for in situ, continuous, and non-invasive monitoring is crucial for early warning and precision intervention. This review systematically explores recent advances in high-fidelity wound monitoring, focusing on the deep integration of "front-end interface engineering" and "back-end data analysis". We first analyze the specific physicochemical and biochemical abnormalities of the diabetic wound microenvironment. Next, we discuss how advanced material designs, such as active fluid management, anti-biofouling zwitterionic networks, and nanozyme-based reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, ensure the long-term stability of sensing interfaces against complex microenvironmental interference. Building on this hardware foundation, we summarize in situ sensing strategies and multiparameter decoupling techniques tailored for key biomarkers, including pH, temperature, glucose, ROS, and MMP-9. Furthermore, we highlight cutting-edge developments in signal digitization, emphasizing the pivotal role of portable devices and machine learning algorithms in extracting high-dimensional features and translating complex multimodal signals into objective clinical metrics. By outlining this comprehensive technological closed-loop, this review aims to provide a systematic theoretical framework for the development and clinical translation of next-generation smart wound monitoring platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.