Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345727›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Toward a Compositional Theory of Trust in Embodied Intelligence: A QNLP Framework for Modeling Context, Interaction, and Trustworthiness.

Yang Li, Yao Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yang LiYouth League Committee, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Yao SongDigital Convergence Laboratory of Chinese Cultural Inheritance and Global Communication, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-6211

Funding

Sichuan Social Science Foundation Project SCJJ25QN19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust in embodied intelligence is dynamic, contextual, and interaction-dependent, but many existing computational approaches still model trust using static similarity structures. This study proposes and evaluates a compositional trust modeling approach based on quantum natural language processing (QNLP). Using open-ended survey responses about human trust in embodied agents, we compared classical NLP clustering and QNLP-based clustering in terms of dimension coverage, semantic coherence, contextual sensitivity, and robustness. The QNLP pipeline captured richer latent structure, producing ten clusters and identifying eight trust dimensions, including two emergent dimensions: calibrated trust and predictive reliability. Compared with classical approaches, QNLP clusters showed improved semantic separation and stronger context retention under preprocessing variation. These findings support a temporally structured view of trust in embodied AI and demonstrate that compositional quantum-inspired representations can reveal nuanced trust dynamics that are difficult to detect with conventional methods. This study contributes both a methodological framework for trust-sensitive text modeling and a theoretical account linking trust formation to retrospective calibration and prospective expectation in human-agent interaction.

Indexed as

clustering analysiscompositional semanticsembodied intelligencehuman–AI interactionhuman–robot trustpredictive reliabilityquantum natural language processingtrust calibration

Identifiers

PMID42345727
PMCPMC13297457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.