Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345719›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Drosophila Optimization Algorithm Based on Chaotic Development Mechanism and Orthogonal Learning Strategy for Reservoir Optimization.

Rong Lv, Guofa Lei, Hanchao Liu, Yuhan Sun, Wenhua Wang, Xuebin Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rong LvWuhan Geological Survey Center of China Geological Survey (Central South Geological Science and Technology Innovation Center), Wuhan 430205, China.
Guofa LeiGas Production Plant 5, Changqing Oilfield Company of PetroChina, Xi'an 710018, China.
Hanchao LiuGas Production Plant 5, Changqing Oilfield Company of PetroChina, Xi'an 710018, China.
Yuhan SunGas Production Plant 5, Changqing Oilfield Company of PetroChina, Xi'an 710018, China.
Wenhua WangChina Petroleum Group Oriental Geophysical Exploration Co., Ltd., Research Institute Dagang Branch, Tianjin 300280, China.
Xuebin DuCollege of Oceanography, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42472197National Natural Science Foundation of China 42502129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing oil and gas production performance is essential for maintaining the economic sustainability of petroleum enterprises and meeting the increasing global energy requirements. In this context, subsurface production optimization constitutes a fundamental component of strategic reservoir management, directly affecting critical decisions such as well location design and the regulation of operational parameters. Nevertheless, conventional reservoir optimization approaches are frequently constrained by high computational costs and limited optimization effectiveness. To overcome these limitations, evolutionary algorithms have gained considerable attention for addressing complex optimization tasks, owing to their gradient-free nature and strong capability for parallel exploration. This paper proposes a chaotic exploitation orthogonal learning fruit fly optimization algorithm (COFOA) tailored for global optimization and oil and gas production optimization. Specifically, we integrate a chaotic exploitation mechanism and an orthogonal learning strategy to improve the balance between exploration and exploitation. Following the population update in FOA, the chaotic exploitation mechanism is first applied to help the population escape local optima and enhance search efficiency. Subsequently, the orthogonal learning strategy is employed to strengthen the algorithm's exploitation capability. To evaluate the performance of the improved FOA, extensive experiments were conducted on benchmark functions from IEEE CEC 2017 and IEEE CEC 2022, including ablation studies, scalability tests and comparisons with state-of-the-art algorithms. The results demonstrate that the proposed FOA significantly outperforms competing algorithms in optimizing reservoir production. COFOA demonstrates consistent performance superiority over all compared algorithms in terms of mean NPV. Specifically, it achieves improvements of approximately 2.35% to 16.23% compared with existing methods. Notably, COFOA outperforms strong competitors such as mSCA and BLPSO by 2.35% and 3.81%, respectively, while achieving more significant gains over algorithms such as SCADE (15.31%) and CCMSCSA (16.23%). Even when compared with relatively competitive methods like HGWO and CCMWOA, COFOA still maintains performance improvements of 4.79% and 6.12%, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate the superior optimization capability of COFOA in terms of maximizing NPV under complex reservoir conditions.

Indexed as

chaotic exploitation mechanismfruit fly optimization algorithmindustrial productionproduction optimizationreservoir production

Identifiers

PMID42345719
PMCPMC13297479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.