ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Drosophila Optimization Algorithm Based on Chaotic Development Mechanism and Orthogonal Learning Strategy for Reservoir Optimization.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancing oil and gas production performance is essential for maintaining the economic sustainability of petroleum enterprises and meeting the increasing global energy requirements. In this context, subsurface production optimization constitutes a fundamental component of strategic reservoir management, directly affecting critical decisions such as well location design and the regulation of operational parameters. Nevertheless, conventional reservoir optimization approaches are frequently constrained by high computational costs and limited optimization effectiveness. To overcome these limitations, evolutionary algorithms have gained considerable attention for addressing complex optimization tasks, owing to their gradient-free nature and strong capability for parallel exploration. This paper proposes a chaotic exploitation orthogonal learning fruit fly optimization algorithm (COFOA) tailored for global optimization and oil and gas production optimization. Specifically, we integrate a chaotic exploitation mechanism and an orthogonal learning strategy to improve the balance between exploration and exploitation. Following the population update in FOA, the chaotic exploitation mechanism is first applied to help the population escape local optima and enhance search efficiency. Subsequently, the orthogonal learning strategy is employed to strengthen the algorithm's exploitation capability. To evaluate the performance of the improved FOA, extensive experiments were conducted on benchmark functions from IEEE CEC 2017 and IEEE CEC 2022, including ablation studies, scalability tests and comparisons with state-of-the-art algorithms. The results demonstrate that the proposed FOA significantly outperforms competing algorithms in optimizing reservoir production. COFOA demonstrates consistent performance superiority over all compared algorithms in terms of mean NPV. Specifically, it achieves improvements of approximately 2.35% to 16.23% compared with existing methods. Notably, COFOA outperforms strong competitors such as mSCA and BLPSO by 2.35% and 3.81%, respectively, while achieving more significant gains over algorithms such as SCADE (15.31%) and CCMSCSA (16.23%). Even when compared with relatively competitive methods like HGWO and CCMWOA, COFOA still maintains performance improvements of 4.79% and 6.12%, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate the superior optimization capability of COFOA in terms of maximizing NPV under complex reservoir conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.