Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345663›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Systematic Evaluation of Biologically Inspired Motion Detection Models: From LGMD and EMD to Hybrid Spiking Neural Networks.

Vanessa Ndiangang, Pengcheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vanessa NdiangangDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4273-5223
Pengcheng LiuDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-4421

Funding

British Council 5329Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Y000773/1Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 00602-410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision detection in dynamic environments demands perception systems that are both computationally efficient and robust to diverse motion patterns. Biological vision systems, particularly those of insects, offer efficient neural architectures capable of rapid motion interpretation under strict resource constraints. This work presents a systematic comparative evaluation of three biologically inspired models: the Lobula Giant Movement Detector (LGMD), the Elementary Motion Detector (EMD), and a hybrid Spiking Neural Network (SNN) incorporating LGMD and EMD-derived motion processing pathways, evaluated on programmatically generated synthetic stimuli with frame-level ground truth. The hybrid SNN achieved an accuracy of 73-87% across stimulus types, consistently exceeding the 75.0% held-out test set baseline, with a precision of 1.0 throughout and a substantially lower runtime than the LGMD implementation. LGMD demonstrated rate-based sensitivity consistent with biological spike-frequency adaptation, while the EMD correctly produced near-zero responses to looming stimuli, confirming its role as a directional rather than collision detector. These results demonstrate that hybridising biologically inspired motion detectors within a trainable spiking framework produces a promising and reproducible approach to collision prediction, while identifying the sim-to-real generalisation gap as a key challenge for future deployment.

Indexed as

bio-inspired roboticscollision detectiondynamic scenariosinsectsmotion perceptionspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID42345663
PMCPMC13297146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.