Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345659›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comprehensive Learning Fungal Growth Optimizer for Numerical Optimization and Reservoir Production Optimization.

Mingyang Gong, Zhenyu Song, Xiaonan Zhang, Yi Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingyang GongSchool of Geophysics and Petroleum Resources, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China.
Zhenyu SongSchool of Earth Sciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China.
Xiaonan ZhangSchool of Geophysics and Petroleum Resources, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China.
Yi TangSchool of Geophysics and Petroleum Resources, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China.

Funding

Sinopec Geophysical Corporation 10350106-25-ZC0613-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fungal Growth Optimizer (FGO) is a nature-inspired metaheuristic that simulates fungal colony behaviors, but its exploitation phase can lose search diversity when guidance is dominated by limited peer or global-best information. In this paper, we propose an enhanced variant called the Comprehensive Learning Fungal Growth Optimizer (CLFGO). We integrate a conditionally activated Comprehensive Learning (CL) strategy into the FGO framework. When a candidate solution stagnates, the strategy constructs a dimension-specific learning exemplar. This mechanism allows each dimension to learn from the personal best of a different peer, extending the original fungal growth model. CLFGO is therefore intended for high-dimensional, multimodal, hybrid, and composition landscapes in which the original FGO is prone to diversity loss, rather than as a universal replacement for all problem classes. This approach improves population diversity and reduces the risk of premature convergence. We evaluated CLFGO on 29 CEC2017 benchmark functions at 30 dimensions against nine metaheuristics under the same maximum-function-evaluation budget. CLFGO achieved the lowest mean error on 21 of 29 functions and attained a Friedman average rank of 1.5517. Furthermore, we applied CLFGO to a reservoir production optimization problem, where it obtained a mean Net Present Value of 9.97×108 USD, outperforming the compared algorithms in both solution accuracy and convergence stability.

Indexed as

Comprehensive Learning StrategyFungal Growth Optimizerglobal optimizationproduction optimization

Identifiers

PMID42345659
PMCPMC13296441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.