ArticleAudiology research2026
Current Practices in Vestibular Migraine Management Among Canadian Otolaryngologists: A National Survey.
Article in Audiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesVestibular migraine is a common but often underrecognized cause of dizziness in otolaryngology practice. Although awareness has increased, variation in clinician training and management may contribute to inconsistent care. This study evaluated current diagnostic and treatment practices of Canadian otolaryngologists for vestibular migraine, including familiarity with diagnostic criteria, therapeutic approaches, perceived barriers, and educational needs.
methodsA national cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to practicing and emeritus members of the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery from February to April 2025. The 14-item survey assessed demographics, clinical exposure to dizzy patients, residency training, diagnostic familiarity, treatment patterns, referral practices, barriers to care, and preferred educational resources. Responses were anonymized and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsForty-four otolaryngologists completed the survey (response rate: 7.4%). Most respondents reported being very familiar (59.1%) or moderately familiar (38.6%) with vestibular migraine diagnostic criteria, and 97.7% reported currently diagnosing and/or treating these patients. However, only 15.9% had received extensive residency training specific to migraine or vestibular migraine. Common treatments included lifestyle and dietary modification (90.9%), nutraceutical supplements (59.1%), tricyclic antidepressants (54.5%), and analgesics (52.3%). Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (29.5%) and calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapies (<10%) were used less frequently. Major barriers were clinical time constraints (65.9%), lack of training or knowledge (54.5%), and diagnostic complexity (47.7%). Clinical guidelines (70.5%) and continuing medical education courses (65.9%) were identified as the most valuable supports.
conclusionsAmong surveyed Canadian otolaryngologists engaged in dizziness and vestibular migraine care, substantial heterogeneity existed in training and management practices. Standardized guidance, enhanced education, and interdisciplinary collaboration may improve consistency of care and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.