ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Factors Influencing the Maintenance of Advanced Life Support Competencies Among Critical Care Professionals: A Scoping Review.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced life support (ALS) competence may deteriorate within months after certification, but what supports ongoing competence in critical care remains unclear.
aimTo map factors influencing maintenance of ALS competence among critical care professionals working in critical care settings. STUDY
designScoping review conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched (from February to March 2025). We included peer-reviewed and grey sources from hospital-based critical care settings that assessed ALS competencies over time. Data were synthesised using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty-five sources were included (19 peer-reviewed, 6 grey). Factors were mapped to three domains. Educational factors were most frequently reported and centred on simulation-based rehearsal, structured feedback and debriefing and spaced refreshers delivered in brief, frequent sessions. Institutional determinants related to protected training time, access to resources, standardised roles and content and monitoring through audit and feedback. Individual determinants included clinical exposure and experience, perceived preparedness and self-confidence, stress and cognitive load, engagement in ongoing learning and non-technical behaviours. Outcomes were largely simulation-based or self-reported, and longer-term durability was inconsistently assessed.
conclusionsMaintenance of ALS competence appears to require coordinated educational and organisational supports; longitudinal evaluations with explicit definitions and validated outcomes are needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Critical care services may strengthen ALS competence maintenance by embedding recurrent, context-aligned rehearsal with feedback, supported by protected training time, accessible training infrastructure and ongoing performance monitoring. REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PEQJH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.