SynthesisBioMed research international2026
Survival Rate and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained Ceramic-Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival Rate and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained Ceramic-Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe present systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed at evaluating the survival rate and biological complications of screw-retained ceramic-veneered implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs).
methodThe design and implementation of the present systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the 27-item PRISMA 2020 checklist. A search was conducted based on keywords related to the research objective in the international databases (Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE [PubMed and Ovid]) until January 2025. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the standard Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. In the present study, survival rate, success rate, and complication rate were evaluated with a fixed effects model at a 95% confidence level; Stata 17 software was used to perform meta-analysis.
resultThe survival rate of screw-retained ceramic-veneered ISFDPs was 97% (effect size [ES]: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92-1.09; I
conclusionScrew-retained ceramic-veneered ISFDPs had a high and acceptable success rate and survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.