ReviewNucleic acids research2026
Caveat emptor: predicting and modeling protein-DNA recognition and binding via machine-learning computational approaches.
Review in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The activity, divergence, and evolutionary degradation of modern-day homing endonucleases and behavior of their reconstructed ancestors.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent development of AI-based predictive tools, such as AlphaFold3, for the prediction of the structures of biological molecules and their complexes has transformed modern molecular and cellular biology. While it displays exceptional accuracy in the modeling of folded protein domains and subunits, as well as larger protein-protein complexes and assemblages, AlphaFold3's performance in predicting the details of protein-DNA (or more broadly, protein-nucleic acid) contacts and complexes is less well established. Here we summarize the recent development and performance of tools intended to predict, model, and/or design protein:DNA recognition and contacts, and then demonstrate (using a well-defined system that offers a minimal "degree of difficulty") the issues that often surround the use of a resource such as AlphaFold3 for predicting protein:DNA interactions. Beyond providing a cautionary tale for casual users, we note that the incorporation of hybrid models of protein-DNA complexes (in which computationally predicted models are docked into low-resolution CryoEM density maps with little further refinement or quality control) into future training sets may lead to an ongoing and inappropriate learning cycle that further encourages such tools to generate new, equally inaccurate models of protein-DNA complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.