ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Follow the money: A startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries, and regions.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of AI into the workplace is advancing rapidly, necessitating robust metrics to evaluate its tangible impact on the labor market. Existing measures of AI occupational exposure focus primarily on the theoretical potential of AI to substitute or complement human labor based on technical feasibility, offering limited insights into actual adoption. To address this gap, we introduce the AI Startup Exposure (AISE) index, a novel metric based on O*NET occupational descriptions and AI applications developed by venture backed startups worldwide. Our findings indicate that even though white-collar high-skilled occupations are theoretically highly exposed, they are heterogeneously targeted by AI startups. Roles involving routine organizational tasks, such as data analysis and office management, show significant exposure, while occupations involving tasks that are tied to ethical or high-stakes considerations-such as judges or surgeons-present lower AISE scores, despite technical feasibility for automation. Our approach challenges the conventional assumption that high-skilled jobs uniformly face high AI risks, highlighting instead societal desirability and market-oriented choices as critical determinants of AI exposure. Contrary to fears of widespread job displacement, our findings suggest that AI adoption will be gradual and shaped by social factors as much as the technical feasibility of AI applications. This framework provides a forward-looking tool for policymakers to monitor the evolving impact of AI and navigate a fast changing labor market landscape.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.