ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Construction and verification of early diagnosis model of tuberculous meningitis.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a diagnostic model capable of accurately distinguishing between TBM and non-TBM in adults using basic clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: Demographic information, clinical symptoms, imaging characteristics, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters were collected. Consecutive patients diagnosed with TBM or non-TBM who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled from June 2019 to June 2024 at Ningbo No.2 Hospital (training set). A random sample of 100 eligible patients from the same period at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University served as the validation set. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was applied for variable selection, generating a set of 53 variables with non-zero coefficients. These variables were then ranked by the magnitude of their coefficients, and the top 7 variables with the highest importance were retained for the final multivariate logistic regression model. Model performance, including discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, was validated in both cohorts. Results: Multivariate logistic regression identified seizures at admission, mental and behavioral abnormalities, thalamic abnormalities on brain MRI, a positive Pandy test, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, CSF glucose levels, and serum albumin as independent predictors of TBM (p < 0.05). The model showed promising discrimination (AUC 0.876 vs. 0.958) and good calibration in both cohorts. Decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility, suggesting potential to enhance diagnostic practice. Conclusion: This multivariable diagnostic model can assist clinicians in early differentiation between TBM and non-TBM using simple clinical and laboratory parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.