ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Trauma-sensitive obstetrics: Potential for optimization from the providers' perspectives.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTraumatic birth experiences are increasingly recognized as a significant issue in maternity care. While many studies focus on the perspectives of birthing persons, little is known about how healthcare providers perceive the causes of traumatic births and possible strategies to prevent them. This study explores obstetric care providers' perceptions of factors contributing to traumatic birth experiences and their suggestions for improving trauma sensitive obstetric care.
methodsA convergent parallel mixed methods design was used. An online survey among obstetric care providers in Germany was conducted between October 2024 and February 2025 (n=102). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and using logistic regression models. In addition, four expert interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings from both strands were integrated during interpretation.
resultsMost respondents defined traumatic birth experiences primarily through loss of control (85.3%) and negative emotions (75.5%). Lack of communication and information was identified as the most important contributing factor (97.1%), followed by lack of emotional support (89.2%). Emotional support was rated as the most important preventive measure (mean=4.86; SD=0.51). The main barriers to trauma sensitive care were lack of time (mean=4.52; SD=0.81) and staff shortages (mean=4.35; SD=0.83). Interview findings highlighted structural challenges, the importance of reflective practice among caregivers, and the need for systematic training in trauma sensitive communication.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the need to strengthen trauma sensitive approaches in obstetric care through improved communication, emotional support, and shared decision making. In addition to structural improvements such as adequate staffing, regular training and reflective practice among providers may help reduce traumatic birth experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.