ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Simultaneous confidence regions for image excursion sets: A validation study with applications in fMRI.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is commonly used to localize brain regions activated during a task. Methods have been developed for constructing confidence regions of image excursion sets, allowing inference on brain regions exceeding non-zero activation thresholds. However, these methods have been limited to a single predefined threshold and brain volume data, overlooking more sensitive cortical surface analyses. We present an approach that constructs simultaneous confidence regions (SCRs) which are valid for all possible activation thresholds and are applicable to both volume and surface data. This approach is based on a recent method that constructs SCRs from simultaneous confidence bands (SCBs), obtained by using the bootstrap on 1D and 2D images. To extend this method to fMRI studies, we evaluate the validity of the bootstrap with fMRI data through extensive 2D simulations. Six bootstrap variants, including the nonparametric bootstrap and multiplier bootstrap, are compared. The Rademacher multiplier bootstrap-t performs the best, achieving a coverage rate close to the nominal level with sample sizes as low as 10. We further validate our approach using realistic noise simulations obtained by resampling resting-state 3D fMRI data, a technique that has become the gold standard in the field. Moreover, our implementation handles data of any dimension and is equipped with interactive visualization tools designed for fMRI analysis. We apply our approach to task fMRI volume data and surface data from the Human Connectome Project, showcasing the method's utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.