ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Moments of deep connection between clinicians and patients in oncology: a mixed-methods study of sacred moments.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sacred moments are periods of deep connection between clinicians and patients, associated with increased clinician career fulfillment and stronger therapeutic alliances in radiation oncology and internal medicine. Our study is the first to investigate sacred moments in medical oncology. Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians and patients at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive coding. Participants completed a closed-ended (Likert-style) questionnaire that assessed demographics, and the frequency and impact of sacred moments. Results: Participants included 24 clinicians and 10 patients. All participants reported having experienced a sacred moment. All clinicians agreed that when they experienced a sacred moment, they felt professionally fulfilled (100%), connected to their patient (100%), and were reminded why they went into oncology (100%). Patients felt connected to their oncologist (88%), had trust in (100%) and felt cared for (100%) by their oncology team.Three primary themes emerged from qualitative interviews: (1) Sacred moment catalysts, (2) Impacts, and (3) Cultivation strategies. Key catalysts included pivotal clinical junctures (such as initial cancer diagnosis and end of life), clinician preparedness and expertise, and longitudinal care relationships. Sacred moments enhanced career fulfillment among clinicians, promoted goal-aligned clinical care decisions, and strengthened patients' sense of being cared for as a whole person. Cultivation strategies centered on efforts to learn about patients beyond their cancer diagnosis, values-based clinical training and mentorship, and workplace culture. Conclusion: Experiencing sacred moments provides oncology clinicians with professional fulfillment and reinvigorates engagement. For patients, these moments build trust and foster goal-aligned care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.