ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Exploring the psychological factors influencing intention to use AI virtual companions: an SEM-ANN study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: AI virtual companion products have shown promise in providing emotional support and interactive experiences, but their user acceptance and broader adoption still face challenges. Building on the TAM3 model, this study introduced AI trust, perceived anthropomorphism, and social anxiety to construct a theoretical model of usage intention. Methods: Using survey data from 712 users in China, the study employed both PLS-SEM and ANN for empirical analysis. Results: The results showed that perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, AI trust, and perceived anthropomorphism were all significantly and positively associated with usage intention, whereas the direct associations of perceived ease of use and social anxiety with usage intention were not significant. In addition, gender showed significant differences in the paths linking AI trust and perceived enjoyment to usage intention, while age showed significant differences in the paths linking AI trust and perceived anthropomorphism to usage intention. Both SEM and ANN indicated that AI trust was the most critical predictor, whereas perceived usefulness had the lowest relative importance. However, the two methods differed in their ranking of the intermediate predictors: in SEM, perceived enjoyment was more important than perceived anthropomorphism, whereas the opposite pattern emerged in ANN. Discussion: The originality of this study lies in its theoretical extension of the user acceptance framework, its methodological demonstration of the advantages of integrating SEM and ANN, and its practical implications for optimizing virtual companion products. Specifically, the findings suggest the need to balance technical safety with emotional experience and to adopt differentiated design and promotion strategies for different user groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.