Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence.

Kresimir Cosic, Anđela Kuljanac, Sara Palermo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kresimir CosicFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Anđela KuljanacSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sara PalermoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of evolving geopolitical instability, hybrid threats, and the increasing relevance of the cognitive domain in modern conflict, there is a growing need to better understand the role of human cognition in defense and security affairs. Advances in cognitive neuroscience provide insights into the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying decision-making, stress resilience, attention, and metacognition, while artificial intelligence (AI) offers new capabilities for data integration, predictive modeling, and decision support. This article proposes a multi-level conceptual framework for integrating cognitive neuroscience and AI as a hierarchical cognitive support system that enhances, rather than replaces, human decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, time pressure, and cognitive load. The integration of soft neurocognitive science and AI capabilities with kinetic hard power may strengthen deterrence, resilience, and long-term defense sustainability. The proposed interdisciplinary framework can facilitate the development of more adaptive, resilient, and human-centered approaches to defense and security in complex and volatile environments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecognitive neurosciencemental readinessmodern defensestress resilience

Identifiers

PMID42344981
PMCPMC13286834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.