Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344976›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A philosophical treatise on information, consciousness, and the architecture of perceived reality.

Phillip A Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Phillip A MartinSaint Leo University, St. Leo, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This treatise presents a provisional interdisciplinary framework that synthesizes established findings from physics, neuroscience, and information theory to address questions that orthodox disciplines have addressed only in isolation. The argument unfolds in layers, each building on the last, and asks the reader to hold conclusions provisionally until the full architecture is visible. The central proposal is that what we experience as reality may be understood as a constructed model generated by a biological prediction engine operating on delayed information, and that the substrate of that information may be described as a pervasive field of topological information states whose defining characteristic is intrinsic expansion. This is offered as a candidate mechanism rather than an established finding. Existing findings in physics and information theory suggest directions consistent with this interpretation, though complete formalization remains to be developed. To move beyond metaphor, we present: (i) a reaction-diffusion formalism in which the golden ratio

Indexed as

consciousnessevolutionary neurosciencegolden ratioinformation-theoretic substratemicrotubulesphilosophy of physicspredictive processingtopological quantum field theory

Identifiers

PMID42344976
PMCPMC13287046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.