Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344974›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Worsened multitasking performance with simulated hearing protection correlates with individuals' choice not to "wear" it.

Matthew G Wisniewski, Patricia McClain, Chelsea N Joyner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew G WisniewskiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Patricia McClainDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Chelsea N JoynerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Workers' reasons for not wearing hearing protection devices (HPDs) largely come from performance issues that occur while wearing. Research has shown that such complaints are justified in regard to auditory situational awareness (e.g., speech comprehension), but other aspects of work performance (e.g., multitasking ability) are rarely characterized. Further, the relationship between HPD-related performance worsening and the choice to wear an HPD has not been objectively characterized. We address both gaps in the literature here. Methods: Participants were presented with moving objects on a computer screen and tasked to track a "target" object by hovering a cursor over it. Target objects where identified by auditory commands sourced from the Coordinate Response Measure (CRM) corpus sentences of the form: " Results: The results show that wearing an HPD can have a significant negative impact on aspects of job performance that include auditory situational awareness (reflected in detecting and tracking the correct target objects) and sensorimotor tracking ability (reflected in how tightly they tracked moving targets). Also, clear preference to listen in the no HPD condition was seen when payment depended on performance. Discussion: We believe that performance problems associated with HPD wearing (both auditory and non-auditory) should be addressed if real workplace change in HPD use rates is to occur.

Indexed as

hearing protectionlistening effortoccupational hearing losssafety sciencespeech-in-noise

Identifiers

PMID42344974
PMCPMC13286916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.