ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Worsened multitasking performance with simulated hearing protection correlates with individuals' choice not to "wear" it.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacts of listening practice on work performance while wearing hearing protection.Discover public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Workers' reasons for not wearing hearing protection devices (HPDs) largely come from performance issues that occur while wearing. Research has shown that such complaints are justified in regard to auditory situational awareness (e.g., speech comprehension), but other aspects of work performance (e.g., multitasking ability) are rarely characterized. Further, the relationship between HPD-related performance worsening and the choice to wear an HPD has not been objectively characterized. We address both gaps in the literature here. Methods: Participants were presented with moving objects on a computer screen and tasked to track a "target" object by hovering a cursor over it. Target objects where identified by auditory commands sourced from the Coordinate Response Measure (CRM) corpus sentences of the form: " Results: The results show that wearing an HPD can have a significant negative impact on aspects of job performance that include auditory situational awareness (reflected in detecting and tracking the correct target objects) and sensorimotor tracking ability (reflected in how tightly they tracked moving targets). Also, clear preference to listen in the no HPD condition was seen when payment depended on performance. Discussion: We believe that performance problems associated with HPD wearing (both auditory and non-auditory) should be addressed if real workplace change in HPD use rates is to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.