Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344973›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in forensic populations: scoping review.

Ana Carolina Dias, Ana Rita da Cruz, Carolina Dall'Antonia da Motta

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana Carolina DiasSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Lusófona University, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rita da CruzSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Lusófona University, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carolina Dall'Antonia da MottaDigital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The literature discusses the association between criminal behavior and brain functional dysfunctions, underscoring the relevance of investigating and intervening on the neural correlates and structures associated with criminal and antisocial behavior. In this context, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to explore brain functioning and has shown significant effects in modulating cognitive and affective functions and as an intervention for various pathologies. This scoping review aims to explore how TMS has been used in forensic context, providing an overview of the TMS patterns used, the respective protocols, and the main conclusions drawn from these investigations, as well as their implications. Methods: The literature search was carried out on b-ON, EBSCO and PubMed, and included all studies carried out up to the date of the search, written in Portuguese, English, French and Spanish. Results: Three studies were identified for review, which demonstrate the potential of TMS in screening and diagnosing functional deficits associated with criminal behavior. It also highlights the untapped potential of TMS as an intervention with forensic populations, as well as the need for research with more diverse samples.

Indexed as

antisocial behaviorcriminal behaviorforensic populationscoping reviewtranscranial magneticstimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID42344973
PMCPMC13286761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.