SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in forensic populations: scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The literature discusses the association between criminal behavior and brain functional dysfunctions, underscoring the relevance of investigating and intervening on the neural correlates and structures associated with criminal and antisocial behavior. In this context, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to explore brain functioning and has shown significant effects in modulating cognitive and affective functions and as an intervention for various pathologies. This scoping review aims to explore how TMS has been used in forensic context, providing an overview of the TMS patterns used, the respective protocols, and the main conclusions drawn from these investigations, as well as their implications. Methods: The literature search was carried out on b-ON, EBSCO and PubMed, and included all studies carried out up to the date of the search, written in Portuguese, English, French and Spanish. Results: Three studies were identified for review, which demonstrate the potential of TMS in screening and diagnosing functional deficits associated with criminal behavior. It also highlights the untapped potential of TMS as an intervention with forensic populations, as well as the need for research with more diverse samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.